Home » Media Center » Client Updates » Client Update: A new precedential ruling on option plans provides more certainty and flexibility to Israeli companies and their employees on awards granted under section 102 of the ITO.

November 21, 2019

Client Update: A new precedential ruling on option plans provides more certainty and flexibility to Israeli companies and their employees on awards granted under section 102 of the ITO.

A new precedential ruling on option plans provides more certainty and flexibility to Israeli companies and their employees on awards granted under section 102 of the ITO.

Adv. Daniel Paserman (CPA) TEP, Head of Tax, together with associates Danielle Skald and Dr. Yehonatan Shiman review the precedential decision of the District Court, which illuminates various aspects of Israeli option plans and under Section 102.

Client Update: A new precedential ruling on option plans provides more certainty and flexibility to Israeli companies and their employees on awards granted under section 102 of the ITO.

For further reading

KEY CONTACTS

Daniel Paserman

RELATED PRACTICES

RELATED NEWS & PUBLICATIONS

Another Step Towards Legislation – the New Reporting Obligations for New & Returning Residents and Trusts

Cancellation of Israel’s Reporting Exemption for New Immigrants and Expansion of Reporting Obligations

THE ISRAELI SUPREME COURT TAX RULING REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF INDIVIDUAL RESIDENCY

Israel Tax Authority Provides Relief for Certain Section 102 Administrative Requirements

New Tax Benefits for the Israeli Hi-tech Industry

Medtronic case – New Judgment Adopts the Tax Assessor’s Claims Regarding a “Business Restructuring”

Israel Tax Authority Publishes Guidelines Regarding SAFE Investments

Business Model Change Tax Assessments – Recent Court Update

“Reality is wrong. Dreams are for real” (2Pac) – Tupac Shakur

Client Update: Taxation of Trusts and Real Estate in Israel – Has the Dispute Come to an End?

Q&A on Israeli Trust Taxation

The Medingo Roche Case: The District Court Dismissed the Israel Tax Authority s Argument of the Sale of ” FAR” Following a Business Restructuring